4.8 Article

Serelaxin, recombinant human relaxin-2, for treatment of acute heart failure (RELAX-AHF): a randomised, placebo-controlled trial

Journal

LANCET
Volume 381, Issue 9860, Pages 29-39

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61855-8

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Corthera
  2. Amgen
  3. Bayer
  4. Cardio3 Bioscience
  5. Cytokinetics
  6. Merck
  7. Novartis
  8. Takeda
  9. Teva
  10. Trevena
  11. Otsuka
  12. Roche Diagnostics
  13. NHLBI
  14. Nanosphere
  15. European Union
  16. Abbott
  17. PDL BioPharma
  18. Alere
  19. Cardio3Biosciences
  20. Celladon
  21. Ceva
  22. European Committee
  23. Dutch Heart Foundation
  24. Servier
  25. Torrent
  26. Vifor
  27. Duke Clinical Research Institute
  28. Momentum Research
  29. Abbott Vascular

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Serelaxin, recombinant human relaxin-2, is a vasoactive peptide hormone with many biological and haemodynamic effects. In a pilot study, serelaxin was safe and well tolerated with positive clinical outcome signals in patients with acute heart failure. The RELAX-AHF trial tested the hypothesis that serelaxin-treated patients would have greater dyspnoea relief compared with patients treated with standard care and placebo. Methods RELAX-AHF was an international, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, enrolling patients admitted to hospital for acute heart failure who were randomly assigned (1:1) via a central randomisation scheme blocked by study centre to standard care plus 48-h intravenous infusions of placebo or serelaxin (30 mu g/kg per day) within 16 h from presentation. All patients had dyspnoea, congestion on chest radiograph, increased brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal prohormone of BNP, mild-to-moderate renal insufficiency, and systolic blood pressure greater than 125 mm Hg. Patients, personnel administering study drug, and those undertaking study-related assessments were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoints evaluating dyspnoea improvement were change from baseline in the visual analogue scale area under the curve (VAS AUC) to day 5 and the proportion of patients with moderate or marked dyspnoea improvement measured by Likert scale during the first 24 h, both analysed by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00520806. Findings 1161 patients were randomly assigned to serelaxin (n=581) or placebo (n=580). Serelaxin improved the VAS AUC primary dyspnoea endpoint (448 mm x h, 95% CI 120-775; p=0.007) compared with placebo, but had no significant effect on the other primary endpoint (Likert scale; placebo, 150 patients [26%]; serelaxin, 156 [27%]; p=0.70). No significant effects were recorded for the secondary endpoints of cardiovascular death or readmission to hospital for heart failure or renal failure (placebo, 75 events [60-day Kaplan-Meier estimate, 13.0%]; serelaxin, 76 events [13.2%]; hazard ratio [HR] 1.02 [0.74-1.41], p=0.89] or days alive out of the hospital up to day 60 (placebo, 47.7 [SD 12.1] days; serelaxin, 48.3 [11.6]; p=0.37). Serelaxin treatment was associated with significant reductions of other prespecified additional endpoints, including fewer deaths at day 180 (placebo, 65 deaths; serelaxin, 42; HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.93; p=0.019). Interpretation Treatment of acute heart failure with serelaxin was associated with dyspnoea relief and improvement in other clinical outcomes, but had no effect on readmission to hospital. Serelaxin treatment was well tolerated and safe, supported by the reduced 180-day mortality.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available