4.4 Article

An Evaluation of the Membership Probability of 212 λ Boo Stars. I. A Catalogue

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/pasa.2015.34

Keywords

stars: chemically peculiar; stars: early-type; stars: abundances

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council
  2. Danish National Research Foundation [DNRF106]
  3. ASTERISK project (ASTERoseismic Investigations with SONG and Kepler) - European Research Council [267864]
  4. National Science Foundation [AST-1211213]
  5. College of Charleston [AST-1211221]
  6. Appalachian State University [AST-1211215]
  7. NSF
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Astronomical Sciences [1211215, 1211221] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The literature on the lambda Boo stars has grown to become somewhat heterogenous, as different authors have applied different criteria across the UV, optical, and infrared regions to determine the membership status of lambda Boo candidates. We aim to clear up the confusion by consulting the literature on 212 objects that have been considered as lambda Boo candidates, and subsequently evaluating the evidence in favour of their admission to the lambda Boo class. We obtained new spectra of similar to 90 of these candidates and classified them on the MK system to aid in the membership evaluations. The re-evaluation of the 212 objects resulted in 64 members and 103 non-members of the lambda Boo class, with a further 45 stars for which membership status is unclear. We suggest observations for each of the stars in the latter category that will allow them to be confidently included or rejected from the class. Our reclassification facilitates homogenous analysis on group members, and represents the largest collection of confirmed lambda Boo stars known.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available