4.8 Article

Paclitaxel-eluting balloons, paclitaxel-eluting stents, and balloon angioplasty in patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent (ISAR-DESIRE 3): a randomised, open-label trial

Journal

LANCET
Volume 381, Issue 9865, Pages 461-467

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)61964-3

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutsches Herzzentrum

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background The best way to manage restenosis in patients who have previously received a drug-eluting stent is unknown. We investigated the efficacy of paclitaxel-eluting balloons (PEB), paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES), and balloon angioplasty in these patients. Methods In this randomised, open-label trial, we enrolled patients older than 18 years with restenosis of at least 50% after implantation of any limus-eluting stent at three centres in Germany between Aug 3, 2009, and Oct 27, 2011. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1; stratified according to centre) to receive PEB, PES, or balloon angioplasty alone by means of sealed, opaque envelopes containing a computer-generated sequence. Patients and investigators were not masked to treatment allocation, but events and angiograms were assessed by individuals who were masked. The primary endpoint was diameter stenosis at follow-up angiography at 6-8 months. Primary analysis was done by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00987324. Findings We enrolled 402 patients, of whom 137 (34%) were assigned to PEB, 131 (33%) to PES, and 134 (33%) to balloon angioplasty. Follow-up angiography at 6-8 months was available for 338 (84%) patients. PEB was non-inferior to PES in terms of diameter stenosis (38.0% [SD 21.5] vs 37.4% [21.8]; difference 0.6%, one-sided 95% CI 4.9%; p(non-inferiority) = 0.007; non-inferiority margin of 7%). Findings were consistent in per-protocol analysis (p(non-inferiority) = 0.011). PEB and PES were superior to balloon angioplasty alone (54.1% [25.0]; p(superiority) < 0.0001 for both comparisons). Frequency of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion thrombosis did not differ between groups. Interpretation By obviating the need for additional stent implantation, PEB could be a useful treatment for patients with restenosis after implantation of a drug-eluting stent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available