4.3 Article

Fast-food consumption, diet quality and body weight: cross-sectional and prospective associations in a community sample of working adults

Journal

PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 19, Issue 5, Pages 885-892

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980015001871

Keywords

Fast food; Diet quality; Nutrient intake; Healthy Eating Index; BMI; Weight; Adults

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Institute Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) [R01DK081714]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective To examine the association between fast-food consumption, diet quality and body weight in a community sample of working adults. Design Cross-sectional and prospective analysis of anthropometric, survey and dietary data from adults recruited to participate in a worksite nutrition intervention. Participants self-reported frequency of fast-food consumption per week. Nutrient intakes and diet quality, using the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (HEI-2010), were computed from dietary recalls collected at baseline and 6 months. Setting Metropolitan medical complex, Minneapolis, MN, USA. Subjects Two hundred adults, aged 18-60 years. Results Cross-sectionally, fast-food consumption was significantly associated with higher daily total energy intake (=725, P=0005), empty calories (=040, P=0006) and BMI (=073, P=0011), and lower HEI-2010 score (=-123, P=0012), total vegetables (=-014, P=0004), whole grains (=-039, P=0005), fibre (=-083, P=0002), Mg (=-699, P=0019) and K (=-575, P=0016). Over 6 months, change in fast-food consumption was not significantly associated with changes in energy intake or BMI, but was significantly inversely associated with total intake of vegetables (=-014, P=0034). Conclusions Frequency of fast-food consumption was significantly associated with higher energy intake and poorer diet quality cross-sectionally. Six-month change in fast-food intake was small, and not significantly associated with overall diet quality or BMI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available