4.8 Article

Tuberculosis 4 Biomarkers and diagnostics for tuberculosis: progress, needs, and translation into practice

Journal

LANCET
Volume 375, Issue 9729, Pages 1920-1937

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60359-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. GlaxoSmithKline, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  2. Aeras Foundation
  3. TB Alliance
  4. EDCTP
  5. EU-FP7
  6. Drug development
  7. EuropeAID-ADAT
  8. UK Medical Research Council
  9. UK NIHR CBRC
  10. Research Council of Norway
  11. Netherlands-African partnership for capacity development and clinical interventions against poverty-related diseases
  12. Danish Agency for Science, Technology and Innovation
  13. Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  14. European Commission
  15. Fonds de la Recherche en Sante du Quebec (FRSQ)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Human infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis can progress to active disease, be contained as latent infection, or be eradicated by the host response. Tuberculosis diagnostics classify a patient into one of these categories. These are not fixed distinct states, but rather are continua along which patients can move, and are affected by HIV infection, immunosuppressive therapies, antituberculosis treatments, and other poorly understood factors. Tuberculosis biomarkers host or pathogen-specific provide prognostic information, either for individual patients or study cohorts, about these outcomes. Tuberculosis case detection remains difficult, partly because of inaccurate diagnostic methods. Investments have yielded some progress in development of new diagnostics, although the existing pipeline is limited for tests for sputum-smear-negative cases, childhood tuberculosis, and accurate prediction of reactivation of latent tuberculosis. Despite new, sensitive, automated molecular platforms for detection of tuberculosis and drug resistance, a simple, inexpensive point-of-care test is still not available. The effect of any new tests will depend on the method and extent of their introduction, the strength of the laboratories, and the degree to which access to appropriate therapy follows access to diagnosis. Translation of scientific progress in biomarkers and diagnostics into clinical and public health programmes is possible with political commitment, increased funding, and engagement of all stakeholders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available