4.8 Article

Effect of rosuvastatin in patients with chronic heart failure (the GISSI-HF trial): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial

Journal

LANCET
Volume 372, Issue 9645, Pages 1231-1239

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61240-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Associazione Nazionale Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri (ANMCO), Florence, Italy
  2. Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Milan, Italy
  3. Consorzio Mario Negri Sud, Santa Maria Imbaro, Italy
  4. SPA
  5. Pfizer
  6. Sigma Tau
  7. AstraZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Large observational studies, small prospective studies and post-hoc analyses of randomised clinical trials have suggested that statins could be beneficial in patients with chronic heart failure. However, previous studies have been methodologically weak. We investigated the efficacy and safety of the statin rosuvastatin in patients with heart failure. Methods We undertook a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in 326 cardiology and 31 internal medicine centres in Italy. We enrolled patients aged 18 years or older with chronic heart failure of New York Heart Association class II-IV, irrespective of cause and left ventricular ejection fraction, and randomly assigned them to rosuvastatin 10 mg daily (n=2285) or placebo (n=2289) by a concealed, computerised telephone randomisation system. Patients were followed up for a median of 3 - 9 years (IQR 3.0-4.4). Primary endpoints were time to death, and time to death or admission to hospital for cardiovascular reasons. Analysis was by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00336336. Findings We analysed all randomised patients. 657 (29%) patients died from any cause in the rosuvastatin group and 644 (28%) in the placebo group (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.00 [95-5% CI 0.898-1.122], p=0.943). 1305 (57%) patients in the rosuvastatin group and 1283 (56%) in the placebo group died or were admitted to hospital for cardiovascular reasons (adjustedHR1.01 [99% CI 0.908-1.112], p=0.903). Inbothgroups, gastrointestinal disorders were the most frequent adverse reaction (34 [1%] rosuvastatin group vs 44 [2%] placebo group). Interpretation Rosuvastatin 10 mg daily did not affect clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure of any cause, in whom the drug was safe. Funding SocietA Prodotti Antibiotici (SPA; Italy), Pfizer, Sigma Tau, and AstraZeneca.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available