4.6 Review

Clinical and translational implications of the caveolin gene family: lessons from mouse models and human genetic disorders

Journal

LABORATORY INVESTIGATION
Volume 89, Issue 6, Pages 614-623

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2009.23

Keywords

caveolae; caveolins; human disease pathogenesis; mouse animal models

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI [R01-CA-80250, R01-CA-098779, R01-CA-120876, R01-CA-70896, R01-CA-75503, R01-CA-86072, R01-CA-107382]
  2. American Heart Association (AHA)
  3. Muscular Dystrophy Association (MDA)
  4. American Association for Cancer Research (AACR)
  5. Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
  6. Department of Defense-Breast Cancer Research Program (Synergistic Idea Award)
  7. Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation
  8. WW Smith Charitable Trust
  9. Breast Cancer Alliance
  10. Elsa U Pardee Foundation
  11. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Core [P30-CA-56036]
  12. Pennsylvania Department of Health

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we review the clinical and translational implications of the caveolin gene family for understanding the pathogenesis of human diseases, including breast and prostate cancers, pulmonary hypertension, cardiomyopathy, diabetes, and muscular dystrophy. Detailed phenotypic analysis of caveolin knockout mice has served to highlight the crucial role of a caveolin deficiency in the pathogenesis of many human disease processes. Mutations in the human caveolin genes are associated with a number of established genetic disorders (such as breast cancer, lipodystrophy, muscular dystrophy, and cardiomyopathy), making the caveolins important and novel targets for drug development. The implementation of new strategies for caveolin replacement therapy-including caveolin mimetic peptides-is ongoing. Laboratory Investigation (2009) 89, 614-623; doi:10.1038/labinvest.2009.23; published online 30 March 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available