4.6 Article

Updating and validating a new framework for restoring and analyzing latency-variable ERP components from single trials with residue iteration decomposition (RIDE)

Journal

PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages 839-856

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/psyp.12411

Keywords

ERP; Latency variability; ERP decomposition methods; Residue iteration decomposition

Funding

  1. Hong Kong Baptist University (HKBU) Strategic Development Fund
  2. HKBU Faculty Research Grant [FRG2/13-14/022]
  3. Hong Kong Research Grant Council (RGC) [HKBU202710]
  4. Germany-Hong Kong Joint Research Scheme [G-HK012/12, PPP 56062391]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11275027]
  6. HKBU Matching Proof-of-Concept Fund
  7. RGC, University Grant Committee of the HKSAR
  8. HKBU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Trial-to-trial latency variability pervades cognitive EEG responses and may mix and smear ERP components but is usually ignored in conventional ERP averaging. Existing attempts to decompose temporally overlapping and latency-variable ERP components show major limitations. Here, we propose a theoretical framework and model of ERPs consisting of temporally overlapping components locked to different external events or varying in latency from trial to trial. Based on this model, a new ERP decomposition and reconstruction method was developed: residue iteration decomposition (RIDE). Here, we describe an update of the method and compare it to other decomposition methods in simulated and real datasets. The updated RIDE method solves the divergence problem inherent to previous latency-based decomposition methods. By implementing the model of ERPs as consisting of time-variable and invariable single-trial component clusters, RIDE obtains latency-corrected ERP waveforms and topographies of the components, and yields dynamic information about single trials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available