4.7 Article

Cost-effective and rapid blood analysis on a cell-phone

Journal

LAB ON A CHIP
Volume 13, Issue 7, Pages 1282-1288

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c3lc41408f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. von Liebig Center at UCSD through the Regional Health Care Innovation Challenge Award from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health
  2. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE) from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health
  3. Army Research Office Young Investigator Award from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health
  4. National Science Foundation CAREER Award from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health
  5. Office of Naval Research Young Investigator Award from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health
  6. National Institutes of Health Director's New Innovator Award from the Office of the Director, National Institutes of Health [DP2OD006427]
  7. OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR, NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH [DP2OD006427] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We demonstrate a compact and cost-effective imaging cytometry platform installed on a cell-phone for the measurement of the density of red and white blood cells as well as hemoglobin concentration in human blood samples. Fluorescent and bright-field images of blood samples are captured using separate optical attachments to the cell-phone and are rapidly processed through a custom-developed smart application running on the phone for counting of blood cells and determining hemoglobin density. We evaluated the performance of this cell-phone based blood analysis platform using anonymous human blood samples and achieved comparable results to a standard bench-top hematology analyser. Test results can either be stored on the cell-phone memory or be transmitted to a central server, providing remote diagnosis opportunities even in field settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available