4.7 Article

Crowd-sourced BioGames: managing the big data problem for next-generation lab-on-a-chip platforms

Journal

LAB ON A CHIP
Volume 12, Issue 20, Pages 4102-4106

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c2lc40614d

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Presidential Early Career Award for Scientists and Engineers (PECASE)
  2. ARO Young Investigator Award
  3. NSF CAREER Award
  4. ONR Young Investigator Award
  5. NIH Director's New Innovator Award from the Office of The Director, NIH [DP2OD006427]
  6. Directorate For Engineering
  7. Div Of Chem, Bioeng, Env, & Transp Sys [0954482] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We describe a crowd-sourcing based solution for handling large quantities of data that are created by e.g., emerging digital imaging and sensing devices, including next generation lab-on-a-chip platforms. We show that in cases where the diagnosis is a binary decision (e.g., positive vs. negative, or infected vs. uninfected), it is possible to make accurate diagnosis by crowd-sourcing the raw data (e.g., microscopic images of specimens/cells) using entertaining digital games (i.e., BioGames) that are played on PCs, tablets or mobile phones. We report the results and the analysis of a large-scale public BioGames experiment toward diagnosis of malaria infected human red blood cells (RBCs), where binary responses from approximately 1000 untrained individuals from more than 60 different countries are combined together (corresponding to more than 1 million cell diagnoses), resulting in an accuracy level that is comparable to those of expert medical professionals. This BioGames platform holds promise toward cost-effective and accurate tele-pathology, improved training of medical personnel, and can also be used to manage the Big Data'' problem that is emerging through next generation digital lab-on-a-chip devices.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available