4.4 Article

A new supplier performance evaluation model A case study of integrated circuit (IC) packaging companies

Journal

KYBERNETES
Volume 39, Issue 1, Pages 37-54

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/03684921011021264

Keywords

Analytic hierarchy process; Data analysis; Supplier evaluation; Cybernetics; Semiconductors; Packaging

Funding

  1. National Science Council, Taiwan [NSC 95-2416-H-216-003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - Most industries have become increasingly competitive nowadays, and a good supply chain relationship is essential for a company to survive and to acquire reasonable profit. Therefore, supplier selection is very important. The purpose of this paper is to propose a novel model for evaluating the performance of suppliers. Design/methodology/approach - A supplier performance evaluation model based on analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and data envelopment analysis (DEA) is constructed. DEA is applied first to evaluate quantitative factors, and the results are transformed into pairwise comparison values for AHP analysis. Qualitative factors are also evaluated through AHP analysis, and a final ranking of suppliers can be obtained by combining the quantitative and qualitative results. Findings - The proposed model can be applied to evaluate and select the most appropriate integrated circuit packaging company for outsourcing. With the incorporation of experts' opinions and the consideration of qualitative and quantitative factors, the model can provide a both subjective and objective supplier performance ranking. Practical implications - The proposed model can be tailored and applied to supplier evaluation and selection in other industries. Originality/value - Although many models are available for supplier evaluation, this paper considers both the subjective and objective performance characteristics simultaneously in the evaluation process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available