4.4 Article

A sensitivity analysis approach of multi-attribute decision making technique to rank flood mitigation projects

Journal

KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING
Volume 17, Issue 6, Pages 1529-1539

Publisher

KOREAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS-KSCE
DOI: 10.1007/s12205-013-0360-7

Keywords

four major rivers restoration projects; flood mitigation; Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM); sensitivity analysis for MADM

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program of the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  2. Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2010-0010609]
  3. Advanced Water Management Research Program [11-TI-C06]
  4. Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport of Korean government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The goal of this study is to evaluate and rank the effectiveness of the Korean governments' Four Major River Restoration Projects. A hydraulic simulation model and geographic information system tools are used to analyze the flood mitigation effects provided by these projects. In addition, the rankings of four major rivers are derived using two sensitivity analyses to weight values and performance measures for Multi-Attribute Decision Making (MADM) technique. As a result, the flood risk presented by the Nakdong River can be most effectively decreased when considering these weights, and levee freeboards are the most critical criterion in the effectiveness ranking. The Youngsan River's flow capacity criterion is also critical for this problem. This study will be helpful in the robust prioritization of various water resources plans.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available