4.6 Article

Comparison of bacterial communities in soil between nematode-infected and nematode-uninfected Pinus massoniana pinewood forest

Journal

APPLIED SOIL ECOLOGY
Volume 85, Issue -, Pages 11-20

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2014.08.008

Keywords

Bursaphelenchus xylophilus; Pinus massoniana; Pinewood nematode; Bacterial diversity; 16S rRNA

Categories

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Forestry Scientific Research in the Public Interest [201204506]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070588]
  3. Foundation of State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resources Reuse of China [PCRRF12014]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Few studies have investigated the soil properties and bacterial communities in Bursaphelenchus xylophilus-infected Pinus massoniana (Chinese red pine) forests. Herein, soil samples were collected from B. xylophilus-uninfected (control) and B. xylophilus-infected Chinese red pine forests in Small Huangshan, Anhui Province, China to investigate the effects of B. xylophilus on soil bacterial composition and diversity by 16S rRNA clone library analysis. The results showed that pH, microbial biomass-associated carbon and nitrogen were lower in the infected soils relative to the control soils while other properties were elevated. In addition, the soil bacterial community abundance followed the order of Acidobacteria > Proteobacteria > Bacteroidetes > Verrucomicrobia > Cyanobacteria/Chloroplast. Shannon-Wiener index, Jaccard index, Shannon evenness, abundance-based coverage estimator (ACE) and species richness estimator (SChao1) decreased below the control levels. B. xylophilus infection led to a reduction in soil bacterial diversity, and Proteobacteria > Acidobacteria > Planctomycetes > Firmicutes in the control soils. Therefore, we suggest that pinewood infections by B. xylophilus can alter the physicochemical properties of forest soils and thus cause changes in the composition and diversity of resident bacterial communities. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available