3.9 Article

Leptin: Adiponectin Ratio and Metabolic Syndrome in the General Japanese Population

Journal

KOREAN JOURNAL OF LABORATORY MEDICINE
Volume 31, Issue 3, Pages 162-166

Publisher

KOREAN SOC LABORATORY MEDICINE
DOI: 10.3343/kjlm.2011.31.3.162

Keywords

Adipocytokine; Adiponectin; Leptin; Metabolic syndrome

Funding

  1. Foundation for the Development of the Community in Japan
  2. Japan Association for Development of Community Medicine, Japan

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Circulating leptin:adiponectin ratio (L: A) is a potential surrogate marker for cardiometabolic diseases; however, the relationship of the L : A with the occurrence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) has not yet been fully explored in the general Japanese population. Methods: We enrolled 678 Japanese subjects (208 men and 470 women, mean age: 58.8 +/- 14.4 [SD] yr; mean body mass index: 23.6 +/- 3.3 kg/m(2)) in this study, and determined their MetS status by using the National Cholesterol Education Program-Adult Treatment Panel (NCEP-ATP) recommendations with minor modifications for the Japanese population. Biochemical markers such as leptin and adiponectin present in blood were measured.The statistical analyses performed were gender-based. Results: The L: A in subjects with MetS was significantly higher than that in subjects without MetS, regardless of gender. The L:A also showed a significant and gradual increase corresponding to the increase in the number of components of MetS present in both the genders (trend P<0.01).The cut-off level of the L :A to detect MetS was 0.59 (sensitivity: 0.72, specificity: 0.70) in men and 1.04 (sensitivity: 0.72, specificity: 0.69) in women. Conclusions:These results suggest that the L : A can serve as a clinically useful marker for detecting MetS characteristics in the general Japanese population.The clinical application of this laboratory index for detecting MetS should be assessed in future studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available