4.7 Article

2-Dimension uncertain linguistic power generalized weighted aggregation operator and its application in multiple attribute group decision making

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 57, Issue -, Pages 69-80

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2013.12.009

Keywords

Linguistic variables; Power average (PA); Power generalized aggregation operators; 2-Dimension uncertain linguistic information; Multiple attribute decision making

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71271124]
  2. Humanities and Social Sciences Research Project of Ministry of Education of China [13YJC630104]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2013GQ011, ZR2011FM036]
  4. Social Science Planning Project of Shandong Province [13BGLJ10]
  5. Graduate Education Innovation Projects in Shandong Province [SDYY12065]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 2-dimension uncertain linguistic variables add a subjective evaluation on the reliability of the evaluation results given by decision makers, so they can better express fuzzy information. At the same time, the power average (PA) operator has the characteristic of capturing the correlations of the aggregated arguments. In this paper, we propose some power aggregation operators, including 2-dimension uncertain linguistic power generalized aggregation operator (2DULPGA) and 2-dimension uncertain linguistic power generalized weighted aggregation operator (2DULPGWA), and discuss some properties and special cases of them. Finally, with respect to the multiple attribute group decision making problems in which the attribute values take the form of the 2-dimension uncertain linguistic information, the method based on some power generalized aggregation operators is proposed, and two examples are given to verify the developed approach and to demonstrate its effectiveness. (C) 2013 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available