4.7 Article

Some programming models to derive priority weights from additive interval fuzzy preference relation

Journal

KNOWLEDGE-BASED SYSTEMS
Volume 27, Issue -, Pages 69-77

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.knosys.2011.12.001

Keywords

Fuzzy preference relation; Additive consistent fuzzy preference relation; Additive consistent interval fuzzy preference relation; Linear programming models; Priority weights

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71001075, 70861001, 71020107027]
  2. National High Technology Research and Development Major Program of China (863 Program) [2008AA04A107]
  3. 985 project
  4. 211 project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Deriving priority weights from fuzzy preference relations is a significant issue in decision making problems. In this paper, based on the definition of additive consistent fuzzy preference relations proposed by Tanino, a new approach with a parameter is developed to obtain priority weights, and properties of the new approach are explored. Then, a method for correcting inconsistent fuzzy preference relations is derived, and a new definition for the additive consistent interval fuzzy preference relations is obtained for the interval complementary pairwise comparison matrix. From these, linear programming models for generating interval priority weights from additive consistent or inconsistent interval fuzzy preference relations are established. Finally, three numerical examples are examined to show the feasibility of the developed method, and comparisons are also made between this new approach and the methods proposed by Xu and Chen [15]. Through the numerical examples, the ranking of interval priority weights using the different methods was found to be the same but with a slightly different degree of possibility. However, for the same interval complementary pairwise comparison matrix, the new definition for additive consistent interval fuzzy preference relations proposed in this paper was found to have more consistent information. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available