4.6 Article

Cognitive impairment and potential biological and psychological correlates of neuropsychological performance in recently orchiectomized testicular cancer patients

Journal

PSYCHO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 24, Issue 9, Pages 1174-1180

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1002/pon.3804

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Danish Cancer Society
  2. Savaerksejer Jeppe Juhls og Hustru Ovita Juhls Mindelegat

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of cognitive impairment (CI) in newly diagnosed and orchiectomized testicular cancer (TC) patients prior to systemic treatment, and to explore biological and psychological correlates. MethodsSixty-six TC patients were compared with 25 healthy men on neuropsychological tests and a measure of cognitive complaints. CI status and a global composite score (representing overall neuropsychological performance) were calculated for each participant. Possible psychological (depression, anxiety, stress, and post-traumatic stress symptoms) and biological (cortisol, IL-6, TNF-, and CRP) correlates and predictors of patients' cognitive functioning were explored. ResultsTC patients had lower scores on 6 out of 11 neuropsychological outcomes (p<0.01) in processing speed, attention, and working memory, verbal learning and memory, and verbal fluency. Prevalence of CI among TC patients was 58%, significantly exceeding the frequency in healthy men (p<0.01). Patients' cortisol levels predicted overall neuropsychological performance (p=0.04). Cognitive complaints were associated with IL-6 (p=0.02) and all psychological distress measures (p<0.001). ConclusionsThe prevalence of CI in recently orchiectomized TC patients was unexpectedly high with patients performing more poorly than healthy controls on a majority of neuropsychological outcomes. Cortisol is a potential predictor of neuropsychological performance in TC patients prior to cytotoxic treatment. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available