4.5 Article

Postural stability in patients with anterior cruciate ligament tears with and without medial meniscus tears

Journal

KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 240-245

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2675-9

Keywords

Anterior cruciate ligament tear; Meniscus tear; Postural stability

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2012-0001308]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To compare postural stability in patients with isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tears and ACL tears with associated meniscal tears. Quadriceps and hamstring muscle strength and their ratio, as well as the relationships of these parameters with postural stability, were compared in 23 patients with isolated ACL tears and 27 with combined ACL and medial meniscus tears. Postural stability was determined from the anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and overall stability indices using the Biodex Stability System. On both the involved and uninvolved sides, there were no differences in mean stability indices, including anterior-posterior, medial-lateral, and overall stability indices, in patients with isolated and combined ACL tears. In patients with isolated ACL tears, both overall (2.3 +/- A 1.2 vs. 1.8 +/- A 1.4, p = 0.033) and medial-lateral (1.2 +/- A 0.6 vs. 1.0 +/- A 0.5, p = 0.031) stability indices were significantly higher on the involved compared to the uninvolved side. These differences, however, were not observed in the combined ACL tear group. No significant differences in postural instability on the affected and unaffected sides were observed in patients with isolated ACL tears and those with combined ACL and medial meniscus tears. These findings indicate that there is no need to reduce the goal of restoring proprioception in patients with combined compared with isolated ACL tears. III.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available