Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.High Rate of Infection Control with One-stage Revision of Septic Knee Prostheses Excluding MRSA and MRSE
Joachim Singer et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2012)
Peri-prosthetic hip infections: in favour of one-stage
Thorsten Gehrke et al.
HIP INTERNATIONAL (2012)
Two-stage revision of septic knee prosthesis with articulating knee spacers yields better infection eradication rate than one-stage or two-stage revision with static spacers
C. L. Romano et al.
KNEE SURGERY SPORTS TRAUMATOLOGY ARTHROSCOPY (2012)
Infectiological, functional, and radiographic outcome after revision for prosthetic hip infection according to a strict algorithm
F. Harald R. De Man et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2011)
Surgical procedures in the treatment of 784 infected THAs reported to the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register Best survival with 2-stage exchange revision, but also good results with debridement and retention of the fixed implant
Lars B. Engesaeter et al.
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA (2011)
Two-stage Exchange Arthroplasty for Infected Total Knee Arthroplasty: Predictors of Failure
S. M. Javad Mortazavi et al.
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH (2011)
Risk Factors for Infection After Knee Arthroplasty A Register-Based Analysis of 43,149 Cases
Esa Jamsen et al.
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME (2009)
Share Paper
