4.7 Article

Three-way decisions based on decision-theoretic rough sets under linguistic assessment with the aid of group decision making

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 256-269

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.01.008

Keywords

Linguistic terms; Group decision making; Loss function; Decision-theoretic rough sets; Three-way decisions

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [71401026, 71432003, 71201133, 71201076, 71490722]
  2. Youth Social Science Foundation of the Chinese Education Commission [11YJC630127]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of China [SWJTU12CX117]
  4. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2012M520310, 2013T60132]
  5. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120184120028]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Based on decision-theoretic rough set model of three-way decisions, we augment the existing model by introducing linguistic terms. Considering the two types of parameters being used in the three-way decisions with linguistic assessment, a certain type of novel three-way decisions based on the Bayesian decision procedure is constructed. In this way, three-way decisions with decision-theoretic rough sets are extended to the qualitative environment. With the aid of multi-attribute group decision making, the values of these parameters are determined. An adaptive algorithm supporting consistency improvement of multi-attribute group decision making is designed. Then, we optimize the scales of the linguistic terms with the use of particle swarm optimization. The values of these parameters of three-way decisions are aggregated when proceeding with group decision making. Finally, the proposed model of three-way decisions with linguistic assessment is applied to the selection process of new product ideas. (C)) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available