4.3 Article

Altered dynamic foot kinematics in people with medial knee osteoarthritis during walking: A cross-sectional study

Journal

KNEE
Volume 21, Issue 6, Pages 1101-1106

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2014.08.004

Keywords

Gait analysis; Biomechanics; Rehabilitation; Knee; Osteoarthritis; Foot

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Footwear and insoles are used to reduce knee load in people with medial knee osteoarthritis (OA), despite a limited understanding of foot function in this group. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in foot kinematics between adults with and without medial knee OA during barefoot walking. Methods: Foot kinematics were measured during walking in 30 adults; 15 with medial knee OA (mean age was 67.0 with a standard deviation (SD) of 8.9 years; height was 1.66 with SD of 0.13 m; body mass was 84.2 with SD of 15.8 kg; BMI was 30.7 with SD of 62 kg/m(2); K-L grade 3: 5, grade 4:10) and 15 aged and gender matched control participants with 12 motion analysis cameras using the IOR multi-segment foot model. Motion of the knee joint, hindfoot, midfoot, forefoot and hallux were compared between groups using clustered linear regression. Results: The knee OA group displayed reduced coronal plane range of motion of the midfoot (mean 3.8 degrees vs. 5.4 degrees, effect size = 1.1, p = 0.023), indicating reduced midfoot mobility. There was also a reduced sagittal plane range of motion at the hallux in the knee OA group compared to the control group (mean 29.6 degrees vs. 36.3 degrees, effect size = 1.2, p = 0.008). No statistically significant differences in hindfoot or forefoot motion were observed. Conclusions: People with medial knee OA display altered foot function compared to healthy controls. As foot and knee function are related, it is possible that altered foot function in people with knee OA may influence the effects of footwear and insoles. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available