4.3 Article

Posterior root tear of the medial meniscus in multiple knee ligament injuries

Journal

KNEE
Volume 17, Issue 5, Pages 324-328

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2009.10.001

Keywords

Posterior root; Medial meniscus; Ligament injury; Pull-out; Repair

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The purposes of the present study were to examine the frequency and characteristics of root tears of the medial meniscus associated with ligament injuries of the knee and to evaluate the effectiveness of pull-out repair for restoring meniscus function We retrospectively analyzed the 9 patients (10 knees) with posterior root tears of the medial meniscus and ligament injuries of the knee treated between August 2004 and February 2007 All the patients were male, with average age of 29 8 years, and the mean follow-up period was 29 7 months The pull-out suture technique was used to repair the root tears Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the Lysholm. IKDC, and Tegner scores, as well as the McMurray and Apley tests The mean follow-up period was 41 1 months (range, 30 to 63 months) the incidence of root tears of the medial meniscus with ligament injuries was 274% (10 cases in 365 ligament surgeries) All clinical results showed significant improvement At the final follow-up, McMurray test showed one positive and nine negative cases, and the Apley test revealed two positive and eight negative cases There were no positive findings in anterior drawer test, posterior drawer test, valgus and yams stress test, and posterolateral instability test Healing of the root tear was confirmed by arthroscopy in five patients and by MR in four patients Root tears of the medial meniscus may occur in multiple knee ligament injuries It is important not to miss them. Our results indicate that pull-out repair provides satisfactory results and evidence of healing (c) 2009 Elsevier B V All rights reserved

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available