4.7 Review

Neuroinflammatory pathways in anxiety, posttraumatic stress, and obsessive compulsive disorders

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 229, Issue 1-2, Pages 37-48

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.05.036

Keywords

Generalized anxiety disorder; Social anxiety disorder; Panic disorder; Posttraumatic stress disorder; Obsessive compulsive disorder; Inflammation; Hypothalamic pituitary adrenal axis

Categories

Funding

  1. CIHR
  2. Sick Kids Foundation
  3. Centre for Addiction and Mental Health Foundation
  4. Canadian Psychiatric Research Foundation
  5. Canadian Foundation for Innovation
  6. GlaxoSmithKline Inc.
  7. Wyeth Pharmaceuticals
  8. Lundbeck Canada Inc.
  9. Eli Lilly
  10. Organon
  11. AstraZeneca
  12. Janssen-Ortho Inc.
  13. Solvay
  14. Genuine Health
  15. Shire
  16. Bristol-Myers Squibb
  17. Takeda
  18. Pfizer
  19. Roche

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As prevalence of anxiety, posttraumatic stress, and obsessive compulsive disorders continue to rise worldwide, increasing focus has been placed on immune mediated theories in understanding the underlying mechanisms of these disorders. Associations between the dysregulation of the hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis and these disorders have been recognized in the scientific literature, specifically in regard to cortisol levels, as well as changes in pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines. The present commentary will systematically assess the scientific literature within the past decade in regard to the psychoneuroimmunology of anxiety, posttraumatic stress, and obsessive compulsive disorders. Understanding the mechanisms of these disorders is essential in order to determine efficacious and targeted treatment strategies, which may lead to substantial improvements in overall functioning, as well as significant decreases in societal and economic burden. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available