3.9 Article

Case-Control Study on Risk Factors for Leukaemia and Brain Tumours in Children under 5 Years in Germany

Journal

KLINISCHE PADIATRIE
Volume 221, Issue 6, Pages 362-368

Publisher

GEORG THIEME VERLAG KG
DOI: 10.1055/s-0029-1239531

Keywords

case control study; childhood cancer; epidemiology; immune system; leukemia; risk factor

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the context of a case control study on the cancer risk for children under five by distance to the nearest nuclear power plant, we collected information on other risk factors in a subset. We present the interview study as if it had been an independent study. Parents of 471 cases with Leukaemia, Lymphoma or CNS (Central Nervous System)-tumour from the German Childhood Cancer Registry, diagnosed at age under 5 in the years 1993-2003, and 1457 matched controls were to be interviewed. For Leukaemia, 243 cases/604 controls, and for CNS 102 cases/246 controls participated, lymphoma cases were too few. Questions related to social status, ionizing radiation, pregnancy and birth, immune system, and selected toxins. The analysis is exploratory in nature; variables were selected by backward elimination. For leukaemia we found a significant protective effect of social contacts (OR = 0.50, 95% CI [0.29:0.87]) and a risk for high birth weight (OR=1.96 95% CI [1.12;3.41] comparing >4000 g to normal). We could not reproduce other associations reported in the literature such as a negative association with allergies. For CNS tumours we found a significant protective effect of social contacts (OR=0.30 95% CI [0.13;0.721), of pesticides and herbicides (OR=0.39 95% CI 10.18;0.83]) and an increased risk for low birth weight (p=0.0232). This study on risk factors for childhood leukaemia and brain tumours is relatively small and exploratory. We could reproduce some major associations reported in the literature (leukaemia: social contacts and high birth weight) but not others. Some observations may be reporting artefacts or self selection artefacts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available