4.7 Article

Separate and interactive contributions of weak inhibitory control and threat sensitivity to prediction of suicide risk

Journal

PSYCHIATRY RESEARCH
Volume 226, Issue 2-3, Pages 461-466

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.psychres.2015.01.018

Keywords

Disinhibition; Weak response inhibition; Fear; Threat sensitivity; Suicide

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institute of Mental Health [MH072850, MH089727]
  2. U.S. Army [W911NF-14-1-0027, W81XWH-10-2-0181]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biobehavioral dispositions can serve as valuable referents for biologically oriented research on core processes with relevance to many psychiatric conditions. The present study examined two such dispositional variables weak response inhibition (or disinhibition; INH-) and threat sensitivity (or fearfulness; THT+) as predictors of the serious transdiagnostic problem of suicide risk in two samples: male and female outpatients from a U.S. clinic (N=1078), and a population-based male military cohort from Finland (N=3855). INH- and THT+ were operationalized through scores on scale measures of disinhibition and fear/fearlessness, known to be related to DSM-defined clinical conditions and brain biomarkers. Suicide risk was assessed by clinician ratings (clinic sample) and questionnaires (both samples). Across samples and alternative suicide indices, INH- and THT+ each contributed uniquely to prediction of suicide risk beyond internalizing and externalizing problems in the case of the clinic sample where diagnostic data were available. Further, in both samples, INH- and THT+ interactively predicted suicide risk, with individuals scoring concurrently high on both dispositions exhibiting markedly augmented risk. Findings demonstrate that dispositional constructs of INH- and THT+ are predictive of suicide risk, and hold potential as referents for biological research on suicidal behavior. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available