4.7 Article

Activation of hepatocyte growth factor receptor, c-met, in renal tubules is required for renoprotection after acute kidney injury

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 84, Issue 3, Pages 509-520

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2013.102

Keywords

acute kidney injury; apoptosis; c-met; HGF; inflammation

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [DK064005, DK091239]
  2. National 973 Program [2012CB517700]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81130011]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hepatocyte growth factor is a pleiotrophic protein that promotes injury repair and regeneration in multiple organs. Here, we show that after acute kidney injury (AKI), the HGF receptor, c-met, was induced predominantly in renal tubular epithelium. To investigate the role of tubule-specific induction of c-met in AKI, we generated conditional knockout mice, in which the c-met gene was specifically disrupted in renal tubules. These Ksp-met (-)/(-) mice were phenotypically normal and had no appreciable defect in kidney morphology and function. However, in AKI induced by cisplatin or ischemia/reperfusion injury, the loss of tubular c-met substantially aggravated renal injury. Compared with controls, Ksp-met (-)/(-) mice displayed higher serum creatinine, more severe morphologic lesions, and increased apoptosis, which was accompanied by an increased expression of Bax and Fas ligand and decreased phosphorylation/activation of Akt. In addition, ablation of c-met in renal tubules promoted chemokine expression and renal inflammation after AKI. Consistently, ectopic expression of hepatocyte growth factor in vivo protected the kidneys against AKI in control mice, but not in Ksp-met (-)/(-) counterparts. Thus, our results suggest that tubule-specific c-met signaling is crucial in conferring renal protection after AKI, primarily by its anti-apoptotic and anti-inflammatory mechanisms.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available