4.7 Article

Divergent functions of the Rho GTPases Rac1 and Cdc42 in podocyte injury

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 84, Issue 5, Pages 920-930

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2013.175

Keywords

cytoskeleton; glomerular disease; glomerular filtration barrier; podocyte; transgenic mouse

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes, Digestive, and Kidney Diseases [R24 DK082841, P30 DK081943, K08 DK-088944]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Podocytes are highly specialized epithelial cells with complex actin cytoskeletal architecture crucial for maintenance of the glomerular filtration barrier. The mammalian Rho GTPases Rac1 and Cdc42 are molecular switches that control many cellular processes, but are best known for their roles in the regulation of actin cytoskeleton dynamics. Here, we employed podocyte-specific Cre-lox technology and found that mice with deletion of Rac1 display normal podocyte morphology without glomerular dysfunction well into adulthood. Using the protamine sulfate model of acute podocyte injury, podocyte-specific deletion of Rac1 prevented foot process effacement. In a long-term model of chronic hypertensive glomerular damage, however, loss of Rac1 led to an exacerbation of albuminuria and glomerulosclerosis. In contrast, mice with podocyte-specific deletion of Cdc42 had severe proteinuria, podocyte foot process effacement, and glomerulosclerosis beginning as early as 10 days of age. In addition, slit diaphragm proteins nephrin and podocin were redistributed, and cofilin was dephosphorylated. Cdc42 is necessary for the maintenance of podocyte structure and function, but Rac1 is entirely dispensable in physiological steady state. However, Rac1 has either beneficial or deleterious effects depending on the context of podocyte impairment. Thus, our study highlights the divergent roles of Rac1 and Cdc42 function in podocyte maintenance and injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available