4.7 Article

Improved performance of urinary biomarkers of acute kidney injury in the critically ill by stratification for injury duration and baseline renal function

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 79, Issue 10, Pages 1119-1130

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2010.555

Keywords

acute kidney injury; clinical trail; diagnosis; glomerular filtration rate

Funding

  1. Health Research Council of New Zealand [05/131]
  2. Australia New Zealand Society of Nephrology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To better understand the diagnostic and predictive performance of urinary biomarkers of kidney injury, we evaluated gamma-glutamyltranspeptidase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (AP), neutrophil-gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL), cystatin C (CysC), kidney injury molecule-1 (KIM-1), and interleukin-18 (IL-18) in a prospective observational study of 529 patients in 2 general intensive care units (ICUs). Comparisons were made using the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUC) for diagnosis or prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI), dialysis, or death, and reassessed after patient stratification by baseline renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate, eGFR) and time after renal insult. On ICU entry, no biomarker had an AUC above 0.7 in the diagnosis or prediction of AKI. Several biomarkers (NGAL, CysC, and IL-18) predicted dialysis (AUC over 0.7), and all except KIM-1 predicted death at 7 days (AUC between 0.61 and 0.69). Performance was improved by stratification for eGFR or time or both. With eGFR < 60 ml/min, CysC and KIM-1 had AUCs of 0.69 and 0.73, respectively, within 6 h of injury, and between 12 and 36 h, CysC (0.88), NGAL (0.85), and IL-18 (0.94) had utility. With eGFR > 60 ml/min, GGT (0.73), CysC (0.68), and NGAL (0.68) had the highest AUCs within 6 h of injury, and between 6 and 12 h, all AUCs except AP were between 0.68 and 0.78. Beyond 12 h, NGAL (0.71) and KIM-1 (0.66) performed best. Thus, the duration of injury and baseline renal function should be considered in evaluating biomarker performance to diagnose AKI. Kidney International (2011) 79, 1119-1130; doi:10.1038/ki.2010.555; published online 9 February 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available