4.7 Article

Early postoperative serum cystatin C predicts severe acute kidney injury following pediatric cardiac surgery

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 80, Issue 6, Pages 655-662

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2011.123

Keywords

acute renal failure; cardiovascular; creatinine; epidemiology and outcomes; renal function

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1-HL085757]
  2. Kidney Research Core Education and National Training Program
  3. Montreal Children's Hospital Research Institute
  4. Fondation de Recherche en Sante du Quebec
  5. Canadian Institutes of Health Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this multicenter, prospective study of 288 children (half under 2 years of age) undergoing cardiac surgery, we evaluated whether the measurement of pre- and postoperative serum cystatin C (CysC) improves the prediction of acute kidney injury (AKI) over that obtained by serum creatinine (SCr). Higher preoperative SCr-based estimated glomerular filtration rates predicted higher risk of the postoperative primary outcomes of stage 1 and 2 AKI (adjusted odds ratios (ORs) 1.5 and 1.9, respectively). Preoperative CysC was not associated with AKI. The highest quintile of postoperative (within 6 h) CysC predicted stage 1 and 2 AKI (adjusted ORs of 6 and 17.2, respectively). The highest tertile of percent change in CysC independently predicted AKI, whereas the highest tertile of SCr predicted stage 1 but not stage 2 AKI. Postoperative CysC levels independently predicted longer duration of ventilation and intensive care unit length of stay, whereas the postoperative SCr change only predicted longer intensive care unit stay. Thus, postoperative serum CysC is useful to risk-stratify patients for AKI treatment trials. More research, however, is needed to understand the relation between preoperative renal function and the risk of AKI. Kidney International (2011) 80, 655-662; doi: 10.1038/ki.2011.123; published online 27 April 2011

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available