4.7 Article

Mutations in components of complement influence the outcome of Factor I-associated atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 77, Issue 4, Pages 339-349

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2009.472

Keywords

alternative pathway; complement; complement Factor I; hemolytic and uremic syndrome; thrombotic microangiopathy

Funding

  1. AP-HP [PHRC AOM05130, PHRC AOM08198]
  2. US Immunodeficiency Network

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic studies have shown that mutations of complement inhibitors such as membrane cofactor protein, Factors H, I, or B and C3 predispose patients to atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). Factor I is a circulating serine protease that inhibits complement by degrading C3b and up to now only a few mutations in the CFI gene have been characterized. In a large cohort of 202 patients with aHUS, we identified 23 patients carrying exonic mutations in CFI. Their overall clinical outcome was unfavorable, as half died or developed end-stage renal disease after their first syndrome episode. Eight patients with CFI mutations carried at least one additional known genetic risk factor for aHUS, such as a mutation in MCP, CFH, C3 or CFB; a compound heterozygous second mutation in CFI; or mutations in both the MCP and CFH genes. Five patients exhibited homozygous deletion of the Factor H-related protein 1 (CFHR-1) gene. Ten patients with aHUS had one mutation in their CFI gene (Factor I-aHUS), resulting in a quantitative or functional Factor I deficiency. Patients with a complete deletion of the CFHR-1 gene had a significantly higher risk of a bad prognosis compared with those with one Factor I mutation as their unique vulnerability feature. Our results emphasize the necessity of genetic screening for all susceptibility factors in patients with aHUS. Kidney International (2010) 77, 339-349; doi: 10.1038/ki.2009.472; published online 16 December 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available