4.7 Review

A 'complexity' of urate transporters

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 78, Issue 5, Pages 446-452

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2010.206

Keywords

cardiovascular disease; genetic renal disease; proximal tubule; reactive oxygen species

Funding

  1. UK Medical Research Council
  2. Wellcome Trust
  3. Medical Research Council [MC_U127561128] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. MRC [MC_U127561128] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Genetic variation in the SLC2A9 gene is a new genetic risk factor for low fractional excretion of uric acid, hyperuricemia, and gout. Its gene product, GLUT9, was previously known as a type II glucose/fructose transporter but is now known to function as a high-capacity uric acid transporter that is expressed in kidney, liver, and several other tissues. Follow-up meta-analyses, including one with data from 28,141 individuals, implicated a total of nine additional loci influencing serum urate concentrations, including six other membrane transporters (SLC17A1, SLC17A3, SLC22A11, SLC22A12, SLC16A9, and ABCG2). Variants in these genes together account for about 5% of the variance in serum urate, two-thirds of which is due to SLC2A9. Using these variants in 'Mendelian randomization' analyses provides a powerful means of dissecting the role of urate in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases, where cause-and-effect influences are difficult to discern due to potential confounding. The results highlight the complex interplay of membrane transporters involved in urate metabolism. They also show how variants of weak effect identified by genome-wide association studies can still be important in identifying novel pathways, including a 'complexity' of new and potentially druggable targets for modifying urate transport. Kidney International (2010) 78, 446-452; doi:10.1038/ki.2010.206; published online 7 July 2010

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available