4.7 Article

Suppression of renin-angiotensin gene expression in the kidney by paricalcitol

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 74, Issue 11, Pages 1394-1402

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.408

Keywords

paricalcitol; vitamin D; renin-angiotensin system; progression; renal insufficiency; vitamin D receptor activators

Funding

  1. Asociacion de Amigos del Rinon, Maracaibo
  2. FONACIT, Venezuela [Grant 2005000283]
  3. NIH [DK073183, HL085793]
  4. Clinical Practice Funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The renal renin-angiotensin system plays a major role in determining the rate of chronic renal disease progression. Treatment with activators of the vitamin D receptor retards the progression of experimental chronic renal disease, and vitamin D is known to suppress the renin-angiotensin system in other organs. Here we determined if the beneficial effects of paricalcitol (19-nor 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D-2) were associated with suppression of renin-angiotensin gene expression in the kidney. Rats with the remnant kidney model of chronic renal failure (5/6 nephrectomy) were given two different doses of paricalcitol thrice weekly for 8 weeks. Paricalcitol was found to decrease angiotensinogen, renin, renin receptor, and vascular endothelial growth factor mRNA levels in the remnant kidney by 30-50 percent compared to untreated animals. Similarly, the protein expression of renin, renin receptor, the angiotensin type 1 receptor, and vascular endothelial growth factor were all significantly decreased. Glomerular and tubulointerstitial damage, hypertension, proteinuria, and the deterioration of renal function resulting from renal ablation were all similarly and significantly improved with both treatment doses. These studies suggest that the beneficial effects of vitamin D receptor activators in experimental chronic renal failure are due, at least in part, to down-regulation of the renal renin-angiotensin system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available