4.7 Article

Treatment with amlodipine and atorvastatin has additive effect on blood and plaque inflammation in hypertensive patients with carotid atherosclerosis

Journal

KIDNEY INTERNATIONAL
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages S71-S74

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ki.2008.521

Keywords

carotid artery; atherosclerosis; inflammation; amlodipine; atorvastatin

Funding

  1. Pfizer-Spain
  2. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnologia [SAF SAF2007/63648]
  3. CAM [S2006/GEN-0247]
  4. Ministerio de Sanidad y Consumo
  5. Instituto de Salud Carlos III
  6. Redes RECAVA [RD06/0014/0035]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since previous studies have reported a beneficial effect of amlodipine and atorvastatin treatment in experimental atherosclerosis, we aimed to investigate the effect of the combination of both drugs on blood and plaque inflammation in patients with carotid stenosis. For that purpose, twenty six hypertensive patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy were randomized to receive either atorvastatin 20 mg/day alone (ATV, n = 12) or in combination with amlodipine 20 mg/day (ATV+ AML, n = 14) before scheduled carotid endarterectomy. At the end of follow-up (4-6 weeks), there was a significant decrease in total and LDL-cholesterol levels, but not in blood pressure levels. In contrast, decreased MCP-1 plasma levels, NF-kappa B activation (EMSA) and MCP-1 mRNA expression (quantitative PCR) was only observed in blood from ATV + AML treated-patients. Moreover, carotid atherosclerotic plaques from ATV + AML group demonstrated a significant reduction in macrophage infiltration in relation to ATV group (immunohistochemistry). Our results suggest that combined treatment with atorvastatin and amlodipine decreases inflammatory status of atherosclerotic patients more than atorvastatin treatment alone, suggesting that co-administration of both drugs could have beneficial additive effects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available