4.7 Article

An analytical solution to fuzzy TOPSIS and its application in personnel selection for knowledge-intensive enterprise

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 30, Issue -, Pages 190-204

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2015.01.002

Keywords

Personnel selection; Fuzzy TOPSIS; Karnik-Mendel (KM) algorithm; Analytical solution

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [71171048, 71371049]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20120092110038]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Personnel selection is a critical enterprise strategic problem in knowledge-intensive enterprise. Fuzzy number which can be described as triangular (trapezoid) fuzzy number is an adequate way to assess the evaluation and weights for the alternatives. In that case, fuzzy TOPSIS, as a classic fuzzy multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) methods, has been applied in personnel selection problems. Currently, all the researches on this topic either apply crisp relative closeness but causing information loss, or employ fuzzy relative closeness estimate but with complicated computation to rank the alternatives. In this paper, based on Karnik-Mendel (KM) algorithm, we propose an analytical solution to fuzzy TOPSIS method. Some properties are discussed, and the computation procedure for the proposed analytical solution is given as well. Compared with the existing TOPSIS method for personnel selection problem, it obtains accurate fuzzy relative closeness instead of the crisp point or approximate fuzzy relative closeness estimate. It can both avoid information loss and keep computational efficiency in some extent. Moreover, the global picture of fuzzy relative closeness provides a way to further discuss the inner properties of fuzzy TOPSIS method. Detailed comparisons with approximate fuzzy relative closeness method are provided in personnel selection application. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available