4.3 Article

RESVERATROL PROTECTS AGAINST ULTRAVIOLET A-MEDIATED INHIBITION OF THE PHAGOCYTIC FUNCTION OF HUMAN RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIAL CELLS VIA LARGE-CONDUCTANCE CALCIUM-ACTIVATED POTASSIUM CHANNELS

Journal

KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
Volume 25, Issue 7, Pages 381-387

Publisher

KAOHSIUNG JOURNAL MEDICAL SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70531-5

Keywords

large-conductance calcium-activated potassium-channels; phagocytosis; resveratrol; retinal pigment epithelium; ultraviolet irradiation

Funding

  1. National Science Council [NSC97-2314-B-075B-011]
  2. Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan [VGHKS 98-063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was undertaken to examine the protective effect of resveratrol on human retinal pigment epithelial (RPE) cell phagocytosis against ultraviolet irradiation damage. Cultured RPE cells were exposed to ultraviolet A (UVA, 20 minutes) irradiation, and treated with meclofenamic acid (30 mu M, 20 minutes), paxilline (100 nM, 20 minutes) or resveratrol (10 mu M, 20 minutes). Meclofenamic acid and resveratrol were given after exposure to UVA. Pretreatment with meclofenamic acid, resveratrol or paxilline before UVA irradiation was also performed. Fluorescent latex beads were then fed for 4 hours and the phagocytotic function was assessed by flow cytometry. UVA irradiation inhibited the phagocytic function of human RPE cells. The large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channel activator meclofenamic acid ameliorated the damage caused by UVA irradiation. Pretreatment with resveratrol acid also provided protection against damage caused by UVA. Posttreatment with meclofenamic acid offered mild protection, whereas resveratrol did not. In conclusion, the red wine flavonoid resveratrol ameliorated UVA-mediated inhibition of human RPE phagocytosis. The underlying mechanism might involve the large-conductance calcium-activated potassium channels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available