4.5 Article

Preserved Differentiation Between Physical Activity and Cognitive Performance Across Young, Middle, and Older Adulthood Over 8 Years

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/geronb/gbu016

Keywords

Activity engagement; Adulthood; Cognitive change; Longitudinal; Physical activity

Funding

  1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) [229936, 179839, 973302, 179805, 418039]
  2. NHMRC [1002560]
  3. Australian Research Council (ARC) [120100227]
  4. Dementia Collaborative Research Centres
  5. ARC Centre of Excellence in Population Ageing Research
  6. Leverhulme Trust (UK)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objectives. A critical question in the activity engagement literature is whether physical exercise alters the trajectory of age-related cognitive decline (differential preservation) or is associated with enhanced baseline cognitive ability (preserved differentiation). Further, investigations considering that these relations may differ across young, middle, and older adulthood are rare. Method. We evaluated data from the PATH Through Life Project, where participants aged 20-24, 40-44, and 60-64 years at baseline (n = 6,869) completed physical activity (PA; mild, moderate, and vigorous) and cognitive measurements thrice over 8 years. Results. Multilevel models accounting for employment status, sex, education, health, and mental and social activity showed that between-person differences in PA participation positively predicted baseline performance on fluid cognitive ability (perceptual speed, short-term memory, working memory, and episodic memory). These effects were similar across age groups, but strongest for the youngest cohort, for whom there was also evidence of covariation between within-person change in PA and cognitive score. PA was not associated with change in cognition over time. Discussion. Results support preserved differentiation, where physically active adults have higher initial cognitive ability, and the advantage is maintained over time. PA appears to be unique in showing differences across young, middle, and older adulthood in predicting cognition.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available