Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.Comparing incomparable survey responses: Evaluating and selecting anchoring vignettes
Gary King et al.
POLITICAL ANALYSIS (2007)
Vignettes and self-reports of work disability in the United States and the Netherlands
Arie Kapteyn et al.
AMERICAN ECONOMIC REVIEW (2007)
True health vs response styles:: Exploring cross-country differences in self-reported health
Hendrik Juerges
HEALTH ECONOMICS (2007)
Disease and disadvantage in the United States and in England
J Banks et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2006)
Assessment of differential item functioning for demographic comparisons in the MOS SF-36 health survey
AJ Perkins et al.
QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH (2006)
The interview mode effect on the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression (CES-D) scale an item response theory anolysis
KS Chan et al.
MEDICAL CARE (2004)
Enhancing the validity and cross-cultural comparability of measurement in survey research (vol 97, pg 567, 2003)
G King et al.
AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW (2004)
Comparability of self rated health: cross sectional multi-country survey using anchoring vignettes
JA Salomon et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2004)
A comparison of item response theory and confirmatory factor analytic methodologies for establishing measurement equivalence/invariance
AW Meade et al.
ORGANIZATIONAL RESEARCH METHODS (2004)
Efficacy and tolerability of donepezil in vascular dementia -: Positive results of a 24-week, multicenter, international, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial
S Black et al.
STROKE (2003)
Recent trends in disability and functioning among in the United States - A systematic review
VA Freedman et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2002)
Impact of differential item functioning on age and gender differences in functional disability
JA Fleishman et al.
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES B-PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND SOCIAL SCIENCES (2002)
Share Paper
