4.7 Article

Stress Biology and Aging Mechanisms: Toward Understanding the Deep Connection Between Adaptation to Stress and Longevity

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glu055

Keywords

Aging; Stress resistance; Resilience; Stressors; Psychological stress

Funding

  1. National Institute of Aging [R01 AG0333592-01A1, R01 AG030424-01A2, R01 HL 108821-01]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health [R01 MH083784-01A2]
  3. Larry L. Hillblom Foundation
  4. Glenn Foundation for Medical Research
  5. National Institutes of Health [AG042053-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The rate of biological aging is modulated in part by genes interacting with stressor exposures. Basic research has shown that exposure to short-term stress can strengthen cellular responses to stress (hormetic stress). Hormetic stress promotes longevity in part through enhanced activity of molecular chaperones and other defense mechanisms. In contrast, prolonged exposure to stress can overwhelm compensatory responses (toxic stress) and shorten lifespan. One key question is whether the stressors that are well understood in basic models of aging can help us understand psychological stressors and human health. The psychological stress response promotes regulatory changes important in aging (e. g., increases in stress hormones, inflammation, oxidative stress, insulin). The negative effects of severe stress are well documented in humans. Potential positive effects of acute stress (stress resistance) are less studied, especially at the cellular level. Can stress resistance slow the rate of aging in humans, as it does in model organisms? If so, how can we promote stress resistance in humans? We urge a new research agenda embracing the continuum from cellular stress to psychological stress, using basic and human research in tandem. This will require interdisciplinary novel approaches that hold much promise for understanding and intervening in human chronic disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available