4.7 Article

Association of Telomere Length in Older Men With Mortality and Midlife Body Mass Index and Smoking

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glr064

Keywords

Telomeres; Obesity; Smoking; Mortality

Funding

  1. Jahnsson Foundation
  2. University Central Hospital of Oulu
  3. University Central Hospital of Helsinki

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background. Leukocyte telomere length has been taken as a measure of biological age but several inconsistencies exist. Methods. We investigated associations between leukocyte telomere length in old age, midlife risk factors, and mortality. The Helsinki Businessmen Study (a cohort of mainly business executives, born 1919-1934) had baseline assessments of cardiovascular risk factors including body mass index between 1964 and 1973 at a mean age of 40. Leukocyte telomere length and proportion of short telomeres were measured from DNA samples collected in 2002-2003 (n = 622, mean age 78 years). Body mass index and smoking in old age were assessed from questionnaires. Total mortality was verified from registers through January 2010. Main outcome measures were relationships between telomeres, body mass index, smoking, and mortality. Results. Leukocyte telomere length and notably proportion of short telomeres (<5kb) in old age were significantly (p = .008 after full adjustments) and in a graded manner associated with midlife overweight and smoking. The associations were independent of age and cardiovascular risk factors including postload glucose. Associations with body mass index and smoking were nonsignificant in old age, and telomere length did not predict 7-year total mortality. Conclusions. We conclude that smoking and overweight in midlife, irrespective of glucose, cholesterol and blood pressure, are related to shorter leukocyte telomeres in old men. Telomere length in old age did not predict total mortality possibly due to competing causes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available