4.0 Article

Discrimination of Closely Related Species in Tintinnid Ciliates: New Insights on Crypticity and Polymorphism in the Genus Helicostomella

Journal

PROTIST
Volume 166, Issue 1, Pages 78-92

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH
DOI: 10.1016/j.protis.2014.11.005

Keywords

Tintinnid ciliate; closely related species; cryptic species; polymorphic species; molecular markers; DNA barcoding

Categories

Funding

  1. US National Science Foundation [OCE 0648711]
  2. University of Connecticut
  3. Agencia Nacional de Promocion Cientifica y Tecnologica, Argentina [PICT-O-2010-0128]
  4. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  5. Directorate For Geosciences [1435515] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  6. Division Of Ocean Sciences
  7. Directorate For Geosciences [1130033] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study focuses on the utility of molecular markers for the discrimination of closely related species in tintinnid ciliates. We analyzed the ecologically important genus Helicostomella by sequencing part of the large-subunit rDNA (LSU rDNA) and the 5.8S rDNA combined with the internally transcribed spacer regions 1 and 2 (5.8S rDNA-ITS) from forty-five individuals collected in NW and SW Atlantic waters and after culturing. Although all described Helicostomella species represent a continuum of morphologies, forms with shorter or longer loricae would correspond to different species according to previous molecular data. Here we observed that long forms show both crypticity (i.e. two almost identical long forms with different DNA sequences) and polymorphism (i.e. some long forms develop significantly shorter loricae after culturing). Reviewing all available tintinnid sequences, we found that 1) three Helicostomella clusters are consistent with different species from a molecular perspective, although these clusters are neither clearly differentiated by their loricae nor unambiguously linked to described species, 2) Helicostomella is closely related (probably to the family or genus level) to four Tintinnopsis-like morphospecies, and 3) if considered separately, neither LSU rDNA nor 5.8S rDNA-ITS completely discriminate closely related species, thus supporting the use of multi-gene barcodes for tintinnids. (C) 2014 Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available