4.1 Review

Salivary proteomics and biomarkers in neurology and psychiatry

Journal

PROTEOMICS CLINICAL APPLICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue 9-10, Pages 899-906

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/prca.201400153

Keywords

Biomarkers; Proteomics

Funding

  1. David A. Walsh fellowship
  2. US Army research office (DURIP) [W911NF-11-1-0304]
  3. T. Urling and Mabel Walker Research Fellowship Program
  4. ASPIRE program
  5. McNair Program at Clarkson University
  6. Shire Development, LLC
  7. generosity of SciFund Challenge 3 Donors

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Biomarkers are greatly needed in the fields of neurology and psychiatry, to provide objective and earlier diagnoses of CNS conditions. Proteomics and other omics MS-based technologies are tools currently being utilized in much recent CNS research. Saliva is an interesting alternative biomaterial for the proteomic study of CNS disorders, with several advantages. Collection is noninvasive and saliva has many proteins. It is easier to collect than blood and can be collected by professionals without formal medical training. For psychiatric and neurological patients, supplying a saliva sample is less anxiety-provoking than providing a blood sample, and is less embarrassing than producing a urine specimen. The use of saliva as a biomaterial has been researched for the diagnosis of and greater understanding of several CNS conditions, including neurodegenerative diseases, autism, and depression. Salivary biomarkers could be used to rule out nonpsychiatric conditions that are often mistaken for psychiatric/neurological conditions, such as fibromyalgia, and potentially to assess cognitive ability in individuals with compromised brain function. As MS and omics technology advances, the sensitivity and utility of assessing CNS conditions using distal human biomaterials such as saliva is becoming increasingly possible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available