4.5 Review

Making proteomics data accessible and reusable: Current state of proteomics databases and repositories

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 15, Issue 5-6, Pages 930-949

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201400302

Keywords

Bioinformatics; Databases; MS; Repositories

Funding

  1. BBSRC PROCESS grant [BB/K01997X/1]
  2. BBSRC Quantitative Proteomics grant [BB/I00095X/1]
  3. Wellcome Trust [WT101477MA]
  4. EU [260558, 262067]
  5. BBSRC [BB/K020145/1, BB/K01997X/1, BB/I000909/1, BB/I00095X/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/I00095X/1, BB/K01997X/1, BB/K020145/1, BB/I000909/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Compared to other data-intensive disciplines such as genomics, public deposition and storage of MS-based proteomics, data are still less developed due to, among other reasons, the inherent complexity of the data and the variety of data types and experimental workflows. In order to address this need, several public repositories for MS proteomics experiments have been developed, each with different purposes in mind. The most established resources are the Global Proteome Machine Database (GPMDB), PeptideAtlas, and the PRIDE database. Additionally, there are other useful (in many cases recently developed) resources such as ProteomicsDB, Mass Spectrometry Interactive Virtual Environment (MassIVE), Chorus, MaxQB, PeptideAtlas SRM Experiment Library (PASSEL), Model Organism Protein Expression Database (MOPED), and the Human Proteinpedia. In addition, the ProteomeXchange consortium has been recently developed to enable better integration of public repositories and the coordinated sharing of proteomics information, maximizing its benefit to the scientific community. Here, we will review each of the major proteomics resources independently and some tools that enable the integration, mining and reuse of the data. We will also discuss some of the major challenges and current pitfalls in the integration and sharing of the data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available