4.5 Article

Stable carbon isotopes of tree rings as a tool to pinpoint the geographic origin of timber

Journal

JOURNAL OF WOOD SCIENCE
Volume 56, Issue 3, Pages 175-183

Publisher

SPRINGER JAPAN KK
DOI: 10.1007/s10086-009-1085-6

Keywords

Illegal logging; Isotope fingerprint; Traceability; delta C-13; Forest law enforcement governance and trade (FLEGT)

Funding

  1. Forestry and Forest Products Research Institute [200804]
  2. JSPS [KAKENHI 21688014]
  3. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [21688014] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Illegal logging is a major cause of worldwide deforestation, and demands for scientific methods to identify the geographic origin of timber are increasing. Dendroprovenancing is one such method, in which the origin of unknown wood is estimated by calculating correlations of the ring-width series of the unknown wood with reference trees of known geographic origins. We applied the dendroprovenancing method to carbon isotope network data of pinyon pines (Pinus edulis and Pinus monophylla) from the southwestern United States to test the efficacy of using a carbon isotope time series for provenancing wood. First, we calculated correlations (t values) between test trees temporarily assumed to be of unknown origin and reference trees from 13 surrounding sites. Then, we plotted the t values on a map. When provenancing was successful, the tested trees showed the strongest correlation with reference trees from sites close to the actual origins of the test trees, and the correlations decreased with the distance between the original sites of test and reference trees. This conical distribution of t values enabled provenancing of wood with precision of 114-304 km. Although isotope measurement is more expensive and laborious than ring-width measurement, our tests of provenancing pinyon pines in the southwestern United States showed a higher success rate with carbon isotopes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available