4.5 Review

Exploring the potential of public proteomics data

Journal

PROTEOMICS
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages 214-225

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/pmic.201500295

Keywords

Bioinformatics; Computational proteomics; Data analysis; Databases; Data standards

Funding

  1. Ghent University (Multidisciplinary Research Partnership Bioinformatics: from nucleotides to networks)
  2. Ghent University [BOF12/GOA/014]
  3. IWT SBO grant [120025]
  4. EMBL
  5. Wellcome Trust [WT101477MA]
  6. BBSRC [BB/L024225/1]
  7. Bergen Forskningsstifelse
  8. Novo Nordisk Fonden
  9. Western Norway Regional Health Authority
  10. Kristian Gerhard Jebsen foundation
  11. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/L024225/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  12. Novo Nordisk Fonden [NNF15OC0016102, NNF14OC0010141] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a global effort for scientific transparency, it has become feasible and good practice to share experimental data supporting novel findings. Consequently, the amount of publicly available MS-based proteomics data has grown substantially in recent years. With some notable exceptions, this extensive material has however largely been left untouched. The time has now come for the proteomics community to utilize this potential gold mine for new discoveries, and uncover its untapped potential. In this review, we provide a brief history of the sharing of proteomics data, showing ways in which publicly available proteomics data are already being (re-)used, and outline potential future opportunities based on four different usage types: use, reuse, reprocess, and repurpose. We thus aim to assist the proteomics community in stepping up to the challenge, and to make the most of the rapidly increasing amount of public proteomics data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available