4.7 Article

Choice function based hyper-heuristics for multi-objective optimization

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 28, Issue -, Pages 312-326

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2014.12.012

Keywords

Hyper-heuristic; Metaheuristic; Great deluge; Late acceptance; Multi-objective optimization

Funding

  1. University of Tabuk
  2. Ministry of Higher Education in Saudi Arabia
  3. EPSRC [EP/H000968/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/H000968/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A selection hyper-heuristic is a high level search methodology which operates over a fixed set of low level heuristics. During the iterative search process, a heuristic is selected and applied to a candidate solution in hand, producing a new solution which is then accepted or rejected at each step. Selection hyper-heuristics have been increasingly, and successfully, applied to single-objective optimization problems, while work on multi-objective selection hyper-heuristics is limited. This work presents one of the initial studies on selection hyper-heuristics combining a choice function heuristic selection methodology with great deluge and late acceptance as non-deterministic move acceptance methods for multi-objective optimization. A well-known hypervolume metric is integrated into the move acceptance methods to enable the approaches to deal with multi-objective problems. The performance of the proposed hyper-heuristics is investigated on the Walking Fish Group test suite which is a common benchmark for multi-objective optimization. Additionally, they are applied to the vehicle crashworthiness design problem as a real-world multi-objective problem. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness of the non-deterministic move acceptance, particularly great deluge when used as a component of a choice function based selection hyper-heuristic. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available