4.7 Article

The turbulent Ekman boundary layer over an infinite wind-turbine array

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jweia.2011.11.002

Keywords

Wind farm; Ekman layer; DNS; Turbulence

Funding

  1. UK Turbulence Consortium
  2. EPSRC [EP/G069581/1]
  3. Office of Science and Technology through EPSRC
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/G069581/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A numerical simulation of a neutral turbulent Ekman layer containing an actuator disk array is performed, to improve the understanding of the coupling between the atmospheric boundary layer and large arrays of horizontal-axis wind turbines. An infinite array is represented by 64 disks in a periodic domain. The disks are represented by body forces and aligned with the time-dependent incoming flow. The same flow is also simulated with disks absent. Relative to the latter, the peak shear stress is doubled and located at the top of the disks; with a disk spacing of 5 diameters, the array efficiency is reduced to below 30%, in approximate agreement with the predictions of simple models approximating the turbines as roughness. The disks increase the boundary-layer depth, and the ratio of the ageostrophic to the geostrophic velocity component within the boundary layer, so that the Ekman spiral becomes more pronounced. These effects are required for the satisfaction of the global kinetic energy balance: the power output of the array is directly linked to the integral of the ageostrophic velocity over the boundary-layer depth. At disk height, the power extracted by the disks is locally balanced largely by the turbulent transport of mean flow kinetic energy. However, the increased turbulence kinetic energy production attributed to the disks is a large fraction of the power abstracted by them. The results suggest that mixed tower heights might be more efficient. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available