4.3 Article

Body and Diet Composition of Sympatric Black and Grizzly Bears in the Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem

Journal

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
Volume 78, Issue 1, Pages 68-78

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.633

Keywords

American black bear; bioelectrical impedance; body condition; body mass; diet; grizzly bear; stable isotopes; Yellowstone

Funding

  1. United States Geological Survey (USGS)-National Park Service Natural Resource Preservation Program (NRPP)
  2. USGS Northern Rocky Mountain Science Center Interagency Grizzly Bear Study Team
  3. United States Fish and Wildlife Service
  4. Washington State University Bear Center
  5. Wyoming Game and Fish
  6. Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks
  7. Idaho Game and Fish
  8. Bear Management Office of the Yellowstone Center for Resources at Yellowstone National Park

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Greater Yellowstone Ecosystem (GYE) has experienced changes in the distribution and availability of grizzly bear (Ursus arctos) food resources in recent decades. The decline of ungulates, fish, and whitebark pine seeds (Pinus albicaulis) has prompted questions regarding their ability to adapt. We examined body composition and diet of grizzly bears using bioelectrical impedance and stable isotopes to determine if 1) we can detect a change in diet quality associated with the decline in either ungulates or whitebark pine, and 2) the combined decline in ungulates, fish, and pine seeds resulted in a change in grizzly bear carrying capacity in the GYE. We contrasted body fat and mass in grizzly bears with a potential competitor, the American black bear (Ursus americanus), to address these questions. Grizzly bears assimilated more meat into their diet and were in better body condition than black bears throughout the study period, indicating the decline in ungulate resources did not affect grizzly bears more than black bears. We also found no difference in autumn fat levels in grizzly bears in years of good or poor pine seed production, and stable isotope analyses revealed this was primarily a function of switching to meat resources during poor seed-producing years. This dietary plasticity was consistent over the course of our study. We did not detect an overall downward trend in either body mass or the fraction of meat assimilated into the diet by grizzly bears over the past decade, but we did detect a downward trend in percent body fat in adult female grizzly bears after 2006. Whether this decline is an artifact of small sample size or due to the population reaching the ecological carrying capacity of the Yellowstone ecosystem warrants further investigation. (c) 2013 The Wildlife Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available