4.3 Article

Estimating ungulate recruitment and growth rates using age ratios

Journal

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT
Volume 76, Issue 1, Pages 144-153

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.244

Keywords

age ratios; matrix models; Rangifer tarandus caribou; recruitment; survival; ungulates; woodland caribou

Funding

  1. Alberta Conservation Association
  2. Alberta Department of Sustainable Resource Development
  3. British Columbia Ministry of the Environment
  4. Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers
  5. Parks Canada
  6. Shell Canada
  7. University of Calgary
  8. University of Montana
  9. Weyerhaeuser Company
  10. World Wildlife Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Trends in population growth can be monitored with data for key vital rates without knowledge of abundance. Although adult female survival has the highest elasticity for ungulate population dynamics, the more variable recruitment rates are commonly monitored to track local variation in growth rates. Specifically, recruitment is often measured using late winter young:adult age ratios, though these age ratios are difficult to reliably interpret given the contribution of multiple vital rates to annual ratios. We show that the supplementation of age ratio data with concurrent radio-telemetry monitoring of adult female survival allows both retrospective estimation of empirical population growth rates and the decomposition of recruitment-specific vital rates. We demonstrate the estimation of recruitment and population growth rates for 1 woodland caribou population using these methods, including elasticity and life-stage simulation analysis of the relative contribution of adult female survival and recruitment rates to variation in population growth. We show, for this woodland caribou population, that adult female survival and recruitment rates were nearly equivalent drivers of population growth. We recommend the concurrent monitoring of adult female survival to reliably interpret age ratios when managing caribou and other ungulates. (C) 2011 The Wildlife Society.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available