4.1 Article

BLOOD COLLECTED ON FILTER PAPER FOR WILDLIFE SEROLOGY: EVALUATING STORAGE AND TEMPERATURE CHALLENGES OF FIELD COLLECTIONS

Journal

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES
Volume 50, Issue 2, Pages 308-321

Publisher

WILDLIFE DISEASE ASSOC, INC
DOI: 10.7589/2012-06-150

Keywords

Bovine herpesvirus; Brucella; disease surveillance; Neospora; Nobuto filter paper; Rangifer; serology; storage time and temperature

Funding

  1. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Special Research Opportunity Program
  2. Environment Canada/Natural Resources Canada
  3. Nasivvik Centre for Inuit Health and Changing Environments (Canadian Institutes of Health Research)
  4. Alberta Innovates Technology Futures
  5. Northern Scientific Training Program (Indian and Northern Affairs, Government of Canada)
  6. Arctic Institute of North America
  7. Circum-Arctic Rangifer Monitoring and Assessment Network (CARMA)
  8. University of Calgary Faculty of Veterinary Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Filter-paper (FP) blood sampling can facilitate wildlife research and expand disease surveillance. Previous work indicated that Nobuto FP samples from caribou and reindeer (Rangifer tarandus subspecies) had comparable sensitivity and specificity to serum samples (>= 80% for both) in competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (cELISAs) for Brucella spp., Neospora caninum, and West Nile virus. The same sensitivity and specificity criteria were met in indirect ELISAs for Brucella spp., bovine herpesvirus type 1 (BHV-1), parainfluenza virus type 3 (PI-3), and bovine respiratory syncytial virus (BRSV), with adjusted FP thresholds used for PI-3 and BRSV. Comparable sensitivity and specificity values to serum were also observed for FP in virus neutralization (VN) assays for bovine viral diarrhea virus types I and II; however, reduced sensitivity is a potential limitation of FP samples in protocols that require undiluted serum (i.e., VN and N. caninum cELISA). We evaluated the performance of FP samples from reindeer and caribou in these nine assays after simulating potential challenges of high-latitude field collections: 1) different durations of storage and 2) different processing/storage regimes involving freezing or drying. Sample pairs (serum and FP) were collected from reindeer and caribou populations in 2007-10 and were tested in duplicate. Comparable performance to serum was defined as sensitivity and specificity >= 80%. In the storage experiments, FP performance was determined after 2 mo of storage dry at room temperature, and after two longer periods (variable depending on assay; up to 2 yr). After 1 yr, compared to frozen serum stored for the same period, sensitivity was >= 88% for all but two assays (68% BHV-1; 75% PI-3), and specificity remained >90%. A limited trial evaluated the effect of freezing FP samples as opposed to drying them for storage. There were no observed detrimental effects of freezing on FP sample performance, but rigorous investigation is warranted.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available