4.1 Article

Detection of Clostridium difficile in Small and Medium-sized Wild Mammals in Southern Ontario, Canada

Journal

JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE DISEASES
Volume 49, Issue 2, Pages 418-421

Publisher

WILDLIFE DISEASE ASSOC, INC
DOI: 10.7589/2012-04-120

Keywords

Blarina brevicauda; Clostridium difficile; Procyon lotor; raccoon; short-tailed shrew; small mammals; wildlife

Funding

  1. Public Health Agency of Canada
  2. OMAFRA-UG Agreement through the Animal Health Strategic Investment fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We sampled 325 small and medium-sized wild mammals in Ontario, Canada in 2007 and 2010 to determine the prevalence and characteristics of Clostridium, difficile in wild mammals living in proximity to captive wildlife and livestock. Clostridium difficile was isolated from five of 109 animals (4.6%) on four of 25 farms (16%), but was not isolated from any of the 216 samples from raccoons (Procyon lotor) living on the grounds of the Toronto Zoo. The positive animals included two raccoons from one beef farm, one raccoon from a different beef farm, one raccoon from a swine farm, and a shrew (Blarina brevicauda) from a dairy farm. None had evidence of gastrointestinal disease. Three of the five isolates were toxinotype variants (II, IV, and XIII) that are rarely identified in humans and domestic animals. The other two were toxinotype 0, a common toxinotype in humans and animals; however, all five isolates were of different ribotypes. None of the recovered ribotypes were recognized as ribotypes present in the authors' reference library of over 3,000 human and domestic animal C. difficile isolates. Neither the public health nor the animal health relevance of these findings is clear. It is not known whether C. difficile is a pathogen of small and medium-sized wild mammals, although the susceptibility of various laboratory species suggests it could cause disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available